On 9/19/07, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
> On Sep 19, 11:18 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <snip>
> > > It did compile, i obtained an .so file.
> >
> > How?  Did you try the system-wide Pyrex?
>
> Yes. It was joint work of pyrexc and gcc.
>
> > If so, instead try doing
> >
> >    sage -cython filename.pyx

You'll probably want to use Cython instead of pyrexc, since
it is faster and supports list comprehensions.  See
      http://cython.org

> This yields essentially the same complaint:
> ...388:9: undeclared name not builtin: sage
>
> In other words, sage is unknown to sage...
>
> However (see my previous mail), putting
> import sage
> in the .pyx file solves the problem, even when i just use pyrexc/gcc
>
> In other words, simply having
> from sage.matrix.matrix_space import MatrixSpace
> (according to Mike's advice) was not enough.

That is really weird.  It might be a bug.

William

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to