Hello Sir, I was going through "Algebras" and I had a doubt. Does MagmaticAlgebra and AssociativeAlgebra have to be implemented over Ring only? I went through internet and google uses rings to define those algebras, but the axioms that those algebra follow (Unital, Associative) are also preserved by commutative semirings. Would it be good to define MagmaticAlgebra and AssociativeAlgebra over other objects that follow those axioms too or come-up with alternative Algebra?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-gsoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-gsoc+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-gsoc/e690063b-2cbf-4820-a60f-568a4d088227n%40googlegroups.com.
