On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote:
> > A good first step might be to ban new circular imports, but that means > that e.g. parent structures and their element classes would need to be > defined in the same files for things like > > class FooElement(...): > pass > > class Foo(...): > Element = FooElement > > to work. And I'm sure that's not the only widespread antipattern that > will be uncovered. > If the element is written in Cython and the parent in Python they can't be in the same file. In general I worry about rules that prevent us from breaking up large source files into pieces. David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7c3e1653-b279-9f43-03e8-3f03c682fdf8%40orlitzky.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAChs6_mihh_hcfmag_LgSVEgPN8g_ZqcDjmfeFOGzUa4U8dPEw%40mail.gmail.com.
