+1 from me too. On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 8:27 AM Markus Wageringel <markus.wagerin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Giacpy_sage provides C-bindings for Giac which is already a standard package. > So making Giacpy_sage a standard package as well would allow to replace > pexpect calls to Giac by C-calls, which is the overarching goal of #16688. > Giac is currently used as fallback for symbolic integration where this change > would be useful (see also #28913). In addition, Gröbner basis computations > already use Giacpy_sage as alternative backend, so this would become more > accessible if the package type is changed to standard. > > Therefore, > +1 from me. > > > Am Dienstag, 4. Februar 2020 06:32:43 UTC+1 schrieb Simon King: >> >> Hi Samuel, >> >> On 2020-02-03, Samuel Lelievre <samuel....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Please vote for making giacpy_sage a standard package. >> >> Could you elaborate what giacpy is about, i.e., what functionality would >> it add to SageMath resp. improve in SageMath? That question isn't >> addressed on the ticket yet. >> >> Best regards, >> Simon >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/efcae77d-6fc3-44eb-a65f-5aa14297ea4b%40googlegroups.com.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq3hYK7iGFo08uPu9H0cv7QhAjtV7U7bqDot_%3DH94JNtNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
