* I think its not too difficult to write code that is Python 2.7 + 3.x (for 
high enough x) compatible, so its not a super pressing issue
* We do have a Python 2 buildbot to test for regressions
* For semver reasons we should drop Python 2.7 support in Sage 10, not 9.1

Having said that, I'm fine with an accelerated Sage 9 -> Sage 10 schedule, 
maybe a month or two instead of the usual 3-4. Though first we should take 
the opportunity and see if there are any outstanding Python 3 bugs now that 
we have more data. For example it would be nice if a build with 
SAGE_DEBUG=yes would pass tests. There are a few more regressions, e.g. 
#28817


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4e7cd06a-2d73-4530-b235-d4f675cd9cbd%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to