Great, just cc me on the ticket when you are able to get to it. I might be able to also take your toy implementation and port it over, but I likely won't have time until February.
Best, Travis On Thursday, November 28, 2019 at 1:38:33 AM UTC+10, Salvatore Stella wrote: > > Hi Travis (and all), > I already have a toy implementation and it is indeed worth including in > sage. > Given a chain complex it produces a new chain complex that has the same > homology but whose differentials are much much smaller. > You can look at it here: > https://github.com/Etn40ff/chromatic_symmetric_homology > I'll make a ticket about this as soon as we are done with the actual > writing > of our paper. > Best > S. > > > * Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu <javascript:>> [2019-11-27 > 07:32:59]: > > >From the code provided in the paper, it doesn't look too indecipherable. > So > >a first step might just be doing a direct translation of that since > >understanding the math is not as necessary to do that. > > > >Best, > >Travis > > > > > >On Thursday, November 14, 2019 at 9:01:24 PM UTC+10, Salvatore Stella > wrote: > >> > >> I may be interested in helping out with this but I am definitely not > >> knowledgeable enough on the math behind to tackle the task on my own. > >> S. > >> > >> > >> * John H Palmieri <jhpalm...@gmail.com <javascript:>> [2019-11-13 > >> 18:36:25]: > >> > >> >Sage is not using very sophisticated methods for computing homology. > If > >> >anyone wants to implement something better, they are certainly welcome > >> to. > >> >I may try to look at the paper, but it may take me a while to get to > it. > >> > > >> >-- John > >> > > >> > > >> >On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 at 4:48:18 PM UTC-8, Salvatore Stella > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dear All, > >> >> I was looking into computing homology of a certain chain complex > when I > >> >> came > >> >> across this paper arXiv:1903.00783v1. Apparently he claims that he > has > >> an > >> >> algorithm to do so that is much faster than the one we currently > have > >> in > >> >> sage. Did I understand correctly the claim? If so, would it be worth > to > >> >> port > >> >> his Mathematica code? Input from someone more knowledgeable than me > on > >> >> (co)homology computations would be most welcome. Thanks > >> >> S. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >-- > >> >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "sage-devel" group. > >> >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > >> email to sage-...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > >> >To view this discussion on the web visit > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/70f6386f-8a51-40e0-9660-9110a6665826%40googlegroups.com. > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >-- > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > >To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/ae3b8722-d56c-4fda-8405-312dae5a38c4%40googlegroups.com. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/9a539890-ee96-40f7-9f90-8204ac09d9b1%40googlegroups.com.
