In linked ticket : Because 3 x 3 = 9 and we are at 9.0.beta3 these are three reasons to do the switch
Do you plan to start a sage_numerology package ??? ;-) Heavens... And, while you are at it, why not a sage-astrology or a a sage_econometrics package ? ;-]... Shuddering... That said, +1 for switching to Python3 by default. BUT be damn sure to document the way to compile for/with Python 2 in all places we currently doncument how to compile for Python 3. Le dimanche 27 octobre 2019 02:27:51 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit : > > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28660 > > > Le 26/10/2019 à 17:20, François Bissey a écrit : > > +1 > > > >> On 27/10/2019, at 12:58 PM, Vincent Delecroix <20100.d...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Le 26/10/2019 à 16:58, Volker Braun a écrit : > >>> Maybe I missed it, but I didn't find a ticket for that. I think now > would > >>> be a good time to flip the switch, though. Any thoughts? > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-devel" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to sage-...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4a982d46-747e-abaf-a76a-c7f5764c363f%40gmail.com. > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d264dae8-9a7e-4e6b-aa49-c4d7ce1a7fa3%40googlegroups.com.
