Hi! Although late...
On 2019-09-01, mmarco <mma...@unizar.es> wrote: > ... > > Do you think it is reasonable to do these deep changes in this short time? > If it is , then i definitely vote for it. > > If it is not, then I would propose to leave it as a longer term goal > (hopefully not much longer), and once we have a fully python3 bases sage, > write the guidelines you gave down in the development guide so the new code > follows this approach. I think those things should definitely be in some written the guidelines! Since I am currently migrating my main Sage project from python-2 to python-"2 and 3", I know that not all parts of the change of user code are trivial. I'd find it helpful to have some documents explaining the state of the art in Sage (similar to some documents we have for our coercion framework). I have a question on Cython, though: When functions/methods will more often return an iterator instead of a list/tuple, what is the "cdef" type of an iterator? I.e., how can one tell Cython that a particular object is an iterator, so that Cython can produce faster code for it? Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/qm2h9d%245gsi%241%40blaine.gmane.org.
