On Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 7:39:51 AM UTC-7, YoungMath wrote:
>
> Or, maybe, a better approach would be a direct manipulation via resu._name 
> and resu._latex_name.
>
> However, I'm not familiar with the procedure. Furthermore, is this mailing 
> list right the place to discuss my written code?
>

The code you give doesn't reproduce the error you list (I get "y is not 
defined").

I suspect the problem is that the "wedge" code fails to deal with 
differential forms that don't have their names set. A workaround would be 
to set (dummy) names on "unnamed". A fix would consist of letting "wedge" 
deal with differentials that don't have names set. That's ticket-worthy. 
Probably the author of the file can fix this pretty quickly (and bang his 
head on the desk a couple of times in the process).

The doctest example that comes with the function (which you have adapted 
into your example by the looks of it) shows that "wedge" does work for (at 
least some) differentials that do have a name.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to