Hi Kwankyu, On 2019-02-26, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since my parent is in the category of modules over QQ, then I think > elements of the parent should be automatically treated as module elements, > and using `Element` should just be ok. > > What do you think?
I think that speed matters. I see merit in using specialised Cython base classes for elements (not so much for parents). However, it might be possible to move the functionality of module multiplication (i.e., multiplication of a base ring element with a module element) from ModuleElement to Element without speed loss. Or perhaps somehow make Modules.Elements (i.e., the fundament of Modules(...).element_class) inherit from ModuleElement. If someone implements it without speed loss, I wouldn't oppose. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
