Would it be advisable to change the base programming language to one that does automatic garbage collection instead of having to check to see if a class has been properly disposed like it appears from all of these related bugs?
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 4, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-04 18:06, Nils Bruin wrote: >> Tripledict does that to some extent (with its keys): if one of the key >> parts gets deallocated, the weakref callback removes the strong >> reference to the value. > > Yes, but then we potentially end up again in the situation where things are > *only* weakly referenced. Currently, you still need a strong reference in a > fixed place and ideally we shouldn't. > > I have a very preliminary idea at #26811 to "fix" this. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
