Hi Erik, On 2018-09-11, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh right, thank you for the reminder. I could have sworn there *was* > something like that but I couldn't remember what it was. I think it > works by parsing the Cython sources IIRC.
Correct. And in addition there are certain special methods (_sage_doc_ and so on) that are used in sage_inspect, IIRC, so that wrappers such as @cached_method can forward the signature of the method being wrapped. > The ? interface I think still does very little if anything different > from its default behavior in IPython, and there are a few tickets I > can think of for improving that. Would this be worth opening a ticket > for, assuming there isn't one already? +1. As I mentioned, I thought that sage_inspect was used in ? and ?? since ages ago. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
