On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:07 PM Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> On 2016-06-03 19:55, Simon King wrote: > > Note that testing "a==1" goes through the coercion model as well. > > Sure, but that's not what you want to do. I propose to test something like > > (isinstance(a, int) and a == 1) or (type(a) is Integer and a == 1) > > but then more efficiently. That should be pretty fast. > I would be in favor of Jeroen's solution of special casing 1 in coercion if we want to change the meaning of ~ to bitwise negation. We could also do the same for x**(-1). David > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
