On 31 May 2018 at 11:07, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "mathematical equality" is also a red herring being that there are > many possible definitions thereof. Are we talking equality up to > isomorphism? Etc...
In the example posted by Chris Wuthrich, all the objects invoved were, by construction, subgroups of a common ambient group (in this case G = GF(2, 13)). In this case there is one and only one notion of equality which makes sense, and that is "having the same elements". David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
