> I am sorry, I certainly did not want to offend. Please excuse me. >
It's okay; I wasn't offended, but it was off-putting to me. I hope I was able to explain my impression without offending you. > > Thank you also for your explanation of the reason for having Set. Related > to this: is OK if > > sage: [b for b in my_set_partition] > > yields a list of frozensets? If so, I am almost done (currently running > all doctests outside of combinat, combinat is already passing). > This would be acceptable from an internal workings point of view, but you would not want it to be public. Publicly it should be a SetPartition, but an iteration over that can yield a frozenset. We might need to issue some kind of warning because there are slight behavioral differences between a frozenset and a Sage Set. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
