Hi! On 2018-05-25, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: >> I don't see a reason off-hand why these should not be UniqueRepresentation >> subclasses. >> > > There is a very good reason why they should NOT'. Equality between > subgroups is not uniquely determined by the construction parameters. It's > part of the API of UniqueRepresentation that equality is identity on them.
But they could still be CachedRepresentation. Then, if the same subgroup is given by the same generators, it is identical, but if the same subgroup is given by different generators, it is just equal but not identical. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
