On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Nathan Dunfield <nat...@dunfield.info> >>> wrote: >>>> On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 7:41:49 PM UTC-5, Erik Bray wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I just finished a full build from scratch on Ubuntu 18.04 and it went >>>>> fine. This was of 8.2.rc4. >>>>> >>>>> I don't recall off the top of my head whether anything changed between >>>>> rc1 and rc4 that might have effected this, but you might try bumping a >>>>> rc4 just in case. >>>> >>>> >>>> Erik, >>>> >>>> First, thanks for looking into this. I erred when I wrote rc1, I too was >>>> working with the very latest rc4. I was using my own variant of your >>>> original Dockerfiles, but I just did another run where I cloned >>>> "sagemath/docker-images", edited the first line of >>>> "sagemath-base/Dockerfile" and then did: >>>> >>>> docker build --tag="sagemath/sagemath-base" sagemath-base >>>> docker build --tag="sagemath/sagemath-develop" sagemath-develop >>>> >>>> >>>> The error log looks pretty much the same as before except this time the >>>> package was "ecm-7.0.4.p0" rather than "ecm-7.0.4.p1". >>> >>> Interesting--when I did the build I did it by hand, though for lack of >>> better build instructions I basically just manually followed the steps >>> in the Dockerfile. I will try again the way you did it. >> >> Are you sure you were building 8.2.rc4? In the Dockerfile the default >> is (perhaps wrongly, in retrospect) to build from Sage's "master" >> branch, rather than the more current "develop" branch (this is true >> even for the "sagemath-develop" Dockerfile, which is confusing). >> >> The version of the ecm package in 8.2.rc4 should be 7.0.4.p1. > > Ah, well regardless I just got the failure in ECM too while running > > docker build --tag="sagemath/sagemath-develop" --build-arg > SAGE_BRANCH=develop sagemath-develop > > If I had to wager a guess, the only difference between the Dockerfile > and when I tried building manually is the use of SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes.
Yep, SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes is what did it. I'll look into it further. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
