Hi TB,
On 2018-03-28, TB <mathze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A bit of future bike-shedding: I would not mind if QQ(3) be printed on
> the command line as 3/1 or stay 3, but the LaTeX version is probably a
> harder decision. For example,
>
> sage: latex([bernoulli(i) for i in range(10)])
> \left[1, -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{6}, 0, -\frac{1}{30}, 0, \frac{1}{42},
> 0, -\frac{1}{30}, 0\right]
>
> seems IMO nicer than having many "0/1"'s.
That's a different story. latex(...) is (as far as I know) used to
copy-and-past stuff into manuscripts, and to nicely display stuff in the
notebooks. Hence, the problem that pasting back printed output of basic
types may create something that isn't a copy will not occur with latex.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
