On 2017-11-16 15:02, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I understand that the Python2-syntax of super, i.e. super(class, self), is still valid in Python3 [1] so this should not hamper the transition to Python3, but in writing new code (as I am doing at the moment) shouldn't we use the Python3 way, i.e. super() ?
I didn't know that from "builtins import super" could do that. Personally, I would rather just keep using the Python 2 explicit super(...). There is nothing wrong with that.
Btw such an import is not performed in the file src/sage/structure/parent.pyx cited above, so I am wondering how the super() in that file works...
That's a *Cython* file which supports super() out of the box. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
