On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:47:23PM +0100, Erik Bray wrote: [...] > I don't understand the issue here--if a package is a dependency of > Sage then it will be built, right? This only seems to apply to > optional packages.
Yes. As far as i am concerned, optional packages are a very important part of Sage, and they cause a nontrivial part of building issues for SDL (precisely because they are barely tested on 32bit systems). [...] > Ah, well that's where my improved package uninstallation system comes > in: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22510 > > This actually works very well in my testing so far, but getting the > functionality merged is taking some time as there are some difficult > prerequisites (e.g. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22509). Great initiative! Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
