On 9 November 2017 at 00:50, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > From a discussion last year, I know that creation of finite fields with > generator names is different from without generator names. But still the > following is counter-intuitive. > > sage: k=GF(4) > sage: K=k.extension(3, name='a') > sage: k.is_subring(K) > False > sage: L=k.extension(3) > sage: k.is_subring(L) > True > > Could this behavior be still justified?
Not in my view, John > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
