On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:41:26 AM UTC+9, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2017-08-30 09:37, david....@inria.fr <javascript:> wrote: > > It's not a bug, it's how equality is defined > > Thinking of the coercion model, I would argue that this is a bug. >
It is not a bug as it behaves as documented. But I still wonder whether it is sound to test the condition - they have the same settings for loops, multiedges, and weightedness for equality. Equality for mathematical objects in Sage should be mathematical, as far as practical. > > Of course we don't do coercions for graphs, but one could imagine a > coercion > > graphs without loops -> graphs with loops > > and then the coercion model should compare the graphs after coercing > both to graphs with loops. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
