On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-5, Marc Masdeu wrote: > > @Simon maybe it would help the OP if you elaborated on why the group > cohomology code was not included in the standard Sage... > > @Nikhil I would suggest that you concentrate in writing useful code in > ergodic theory. How to distribute it is secondary, IMO. For ease of > development, you definitely don't want to keep recompiling Sage every time > you make a small change in it, so I'd recommend you develop it outside of > the Sage source tree. Once you have code that you are happy to share, put > it on github.com or somewhere else for people to look at. You can then > worry about how to distribute it then. > > Once you have a fresh build of Sage, recompiling after a small change is quick and easy (unless you are making a more substantial change to Sage). So it is very easy to develop new code within Sage directly. I do this all the time, and sometimes this is the only way because you need to modify some parts of Sage. It also makes it easier to submit it to trac, which allows people to look at it (you do not have to set it to needs review) and build upon it.
Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
