On Sunday, May 14, 2017 at 10:17:52 PM UTC+1, François wrote: > > I am confident cmake can now be moved to optional. I took care > of all of the problems I could see on OS X and helped with the > ones on other platforms. > Do we need some kind of vote for moving from experimental to > optional? > > I suppose it should be mentioned that cmake may fail its own testsuite on a system which has system libraries somewhat out of sync with Sage libraries. See #22999, in particular comments 7-13.
TLDR: cmake tests capabilities of /usr/lib/libblah and then uses SAGE_LOCAL/lib/libblah. Oops... (and there is ATM no way to tell cmake to use the right libblah all the time) > > On 15/05/2017, at 07:19, Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > +1, also for cmake update; the latter is very useful nowadays. > > > > > This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may > not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not > guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient, > please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message > and any attachments. > > Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more > information. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
