> On 5/04/2017, at 01:12, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am starting this debate because of discussion I had earlier > in #22670. It was pointed out to me that there was no policy > of avoiding `sage.misc.package` and I would very much want one. > > > This seems very reasonable, given how much work is going into such packaging. > As a first approximation for 2) (we don't want to give up that auto-testing) > - is there any easy way of auto-disabling the auto-discovery of installed > packages on "distro" Sage versions as opposed to Sage-the-distribution? (Is > there an easy to way to test for which situation one is in?) That would > obviously be a hack, but maybe a better hack than the status quo, I truly > don't know. >
(2) while being just one use, is probably not replaceable. Not in this form at the very least. François -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
