On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Ralf Stephan <gtrw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 4:58:26 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >> >> But there is no reason to *remove* the pexpect, just to make Sage not >> dependent upon it for any "normal" operations. > > > You mean we should leave its dead code in Sage when we're done, just to make > sure porting stays inherently difficult?
As explained by several people above, it is not required for symbolics, but it does implement several unique features that are not available in any other way... William > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
