On 2016-10-18 17:52, Ximin Luo wrote:
(2) In the long run, one can think about splitting out sage.rings.integers (and related
things) into a small library "sage-types" or something like that. Then sagelib
and fpylll can depend on this, and there would be no circular dependency, even when
Debian or other distros try to build it.
I do not understand how that would help you. I am proposing a solution
(A) Split the Sage package in 2 packages (Sage-the-library +
Sage-the-distribution)
and you have various reasons why this doesn't work. Instead you propose
(B) Split the Sage package in 2 packages (sage.rings.integers (and
related things) + the rest)
To me, (A) and (B) look very similar. Why would (B) work while (A) does
not? In other words, why are the problems that you mention for (A) not
applicable to (B)?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
