Hi David,
First, thank you for technical explanations. They are compelling.
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 9:59:50 PM UTC+2, David Roe wrote:
>
>
> In order to create finite fields with arbitrary variable names that fit
> into a lattice of fields, one possibility would be able to give an
> algebraic closure explicitly as an argument to GF. Is that what you're
> suggesting?
> sage: F = GF(3).algebraic_closure('custom')
> sage: K9 = GF(9,'b',Fpbar=F)
> sage: K81 = GF(81,'c',Fpbar=F)
> sage: K81.has_coerce_map_from(K9)
> True
>
Still speaking from a user's point of view, is there also a technical
difficulty in keeping just one lattice of fields? So a new creation of a
finite field gets automatically fitted into the canonical lattice?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
