On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:52:57 AM UTC, Martin R wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 13:36:31 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:36:06 AM UTC, Martin R wrote:
>>>
>>> well, for preprints clearly there is of course the arXiv number and for 
>>> sciences without a good database, there is doi.
>>>
>>> concerning readability, there is a well known justification for using 
>>> sequential numbers
>>>
>>
>> we talk about readability of the source code, too.
>> IMHO one should not name variables and functions just using sequential 
>> numbers :-)
>>
>> Hm, I'd say that reference identifiers in docstrings and variable names 
> are a bit different.  The argument in favour of using numeric references is 
> that it encourages writing: "In 1783, Xin and Müller [1] have shown foo" 
> instead of "In [XiMü1783] foo is shown".
>

No, we are talking about the source, not the output. You will not want to 
write \cite{ref4242} in your LaTeX, you will rather use
\cite{sqlifemean}. Similarly in Python code or in rst files.
And also writing Xin and Müller \cite{sqlifemean} 10 times is bad style, I 
think...



 

>  
>
>> Having said this, I again would argue for an option to have aliases.
>>
>> E.g. say there is a popular Arxiv preprint cited 10 times in the source, 
>> which then becomes
>> a publication. It is really unnecessary to change all these 10 citations?
>>
>
> I have implemented the following for findstat: as long as title and 
> authors coincide (using a threshold for Levenstein distance to get rid of 
> some noise such as accents and punctuation, etc.) the two entries are 
> merged, with preference (in the bibtex file) given to the MR entry.  (I use 
> MathSciNet, zbMath, arXiv and DOI for citations).
>
> Martin
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to