On 01/09/16 04:34, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2016-08-31 23:26, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Hello,
In the optional package giacpy there are some extension classes that
depend on SageObject.
Does it really only need SageObject? I see no reason why giacpy would
need to do that. So the easiest solution seems to make giacpy *not*
depend on SageObject.
We should not forbid inheriting from SageObect/Element,
Parent/CategoryObject in external packages. We should just provide a
simple way to automatize the recompilation. This is a step toward
modularization.
Moreover, I think that we should fix at some moment a definite API for
all these base classes and coercion. Not now since there is some
cleaning going on at #21380.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
