Le mardi 30 août 2016 19:33:20 UTC+2, leif a écrit :
> > Making R optional *will* break existing code. > > How do you come to that conclusion? > To be precise : any code relying on R being standard and using it without bothering checking this assumption. I have such code myself (e. g. a couple of pedagogic notebooks confronting explicit symbolic integration + function evaluation, numerical integration and Monte-Carlo integration, which uses R for the latter). > > Making R optional just means people using R (or the interface to it) > would have to "manually" (=explicitly) install it then (or in the > future, perhaps have to configure Sage '--with-R' or something like that). > (Wouldn't that be "sage -i R" ? ) Indeed. Yet another chore during Sge maintainance.... easily avoided with standard R binary, partially avoided with a standard R interface. HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
