On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:46:40AM -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> A first improvement could be to use:
> Category of X an enumerated sets.
Oops, I just noticed a typo which may have been confusing. I really
meant:
Category of X and enumerated sets.
It's easy to implement, because it's just about changing the _repr_
method of join categories.
> Alternatively:
> Category of enumerable X
This one would be harder to implement (no different from the more
natural "Category of enumerated X"), as we would need to do something
specific for joins with an enumerated set.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
