On the contrary after reading the code for ExpressionNice carefully it is clear that it does not do post-processing as such and should be quite general and robust. However that said, I am very much in favor of using the approach you demonstrated in
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21286 My main question is whether we should try to replicate what is done by ExpressionNice and thereby render it obsolete or should we try to reach some other compromise? On 18 August 2016 at 13:17, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: > > As far as I can tell, ExpressionNice gets its results by string-based > regular expression post-processing. That may be good enough for the > "manifold" setting, if they know expressions are going to be sufficiently > simple, but it's definitely going to break when used for arbitrary > expressions. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
