On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 8:33:33 AM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-08-10 14:36, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > To clarify, I did not say doctests. > > Well, you replied on a paragraph from me about doctests, so I assumed > that we were talking about doctests.
Ah, sorry, I wasn't paying attention to the context. > So again, what's your opinion then? > For doctests...hmmm....I lean towards enabling them so elsewhere in the code, someone doing deprecations can much more easily see what is using the newly deprecated code. However, this does have a problem that if we don't enable them by default interactively, we get different output behaviors. This was something we have avoided in the past. So that is why I don't necessarily want to fully commit to having it on by default for doctesting. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
