I've always wondered why we didn't use GH. Also, I would definitely support some sort of voting on feature/improvement option. I'm not sure if trac is the best place to put it, but I think one of the best things we can do is make it easy for people to report and vote on what features Sage and SMC needs. I often hear the excuse from my professors that Sage is "not as good" as mathematica, though they are rarely able to give specifics. I don't want them to have that cop out anymore; if there's something lacking form Sage, I think it should be very easy to know about it. If often wish there were a list of features that people wanted that we don't have, just so I could look at it and see if there's anything I could contribute to.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
