> I'm sure there is a specific reason that line3d is used here: > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/master/src/sage/modules/free_module_element.pyx#L2307, > > but from what I can tell arrow would also work. Using arrow would allow > for the option of arrowsize, among other arrow specific options, which I > think could make vector 3d plot fields easier to look at and to understand. > Is my understanding of being able to switch from line3d to arrow here > incorrect? >
I think that the arrows in 3d are less pleasant than you think - see https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/master/src/sage/plot/plot3d/shapes.pyx . But if you can clean up vector plots along with the arrow code so that both work better, that would be a very welcome improvement. My personal experience with the 3d vectors is they are too skinny and hard to see by default, the 3d arrows on the other hand too fat and especially disproportional with respect to the arrowheads in many circumstances (especially if you have several differently sized ones). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
