+1

On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 9:44:22 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Hello all, 
>
> I propose to make SageNB no longer a separate package but to move it 
> back into the Sage git tree. For purposes of installation and use of 
> SageNB, it will still be a separate Python package, but the sources will 
> be in $SAGE_ROOT/src/sagenb instead of a separate git repo. The changes 
> to the Sage build system to support this move will be minimal. 
>
> The reason is that SageNB is truly in maintenance mode currently. Making 
> new SageNB releases regularly to fix things is a burden for the SageNB 
> release manager Karl-Dieter Crisman. On #14840 [1], he said "the sooner 
> sagenb gets back in Sage proper, the better!" 
>
> The original reason to split SageNB from Sage was to enable quick 
> development. That worked for a while, but now that development has 
> stalled, this reason no longer applies. A secondary reason was to make 
> SageNB truly independent from Sage, but that also never happened. So I 
> see no reason to keep SageNB split from Sage currently. 
>
> I know this is a controversial proposal, but it will certainly be easier 
> to maintain SageNB this way. I also want to stress that this is 
> orthogonal to any future deprecation or removal of SageNB: we can still 
> do that from the Sage git tree. 
>
> Jeroen. 
>
>
>
> [1] http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14840#comment:58 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to