On 2016-04-14 20:35, William Stein wrote:
However I'm only now starting to complain loudly and repeatedly just because I'm seeing such a huge wasted opportunity.
Instead of complaining, why don't you put together a more concrete and technical proposal of what you actually want? Because this thread is getting really long with a low fact/opinion ratio. Surely by far not enough facts to convince me.
I also see a lot of discussion in this thread about general issues with Sage and Sage development which are unrelated to modularisation. So, when you do write that proposal, be sure to stick to problems which are really caused by the monolithic nature of Sage.
I can believe that there are certain parts of Sage which could be split up (you gave the example of 3D plotting and cysignals), but I think that's only realistic for the non-mathematical parts of Sage. So I wonder if you think that, say, elliptic curves should be a separate package too?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
