On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@lri.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:07:06PM -0500, David Roe wrote: > > One option would be to use underscore methods to make the coverage script > > happy. > > ??? Do you mean that underscore method don't need to be tested ? > Yes. I'm not sure exactly what your methods do, but if it's appropriate for them to not be tested then making them underscore methods means that the coverage scripts don't complain. This might be reasonable if they just call an analogous method on the other class. David > > Florent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
