On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 7:54:03 AM UTC-6, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2016-02-07 14:50, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >> > So then what do you think about the current behavior, where if there >> > is no (implemented) is_prime(), we then try to convert to ZZ? >> >> We don't *try* to convert, we just convert. No problem with that. >> > > I consider it as trying because it may not succeed. Anyways, then let > me rephrase my proposal as convert to the base ring for elements of a > fraction field construction. > I would prefer raising an error. There is a definition of prime for fraction fields, and it's not the same as for the base field. David > > Best, > Travis > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
