Hi On 4 February 2016 at 15:04, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> On 2016-02-04 13:58, Jan Groenewald wrote: > >> I thought it would be more like moving / since it was completely >> self-contained. >> > It doesn't matter: I'm sure that moving / will break everything too. > > I also agree with Volker that most software is *not* meant to be > relocatable. I wonder why you think the opposite. OK, I'll retract that, perhaps I was thinking of software "trees", including all shared libs and so on. But can I say most binaries should not have hard-coded paths patched just after compilation? Regards, Jan -- .~. /V\ Jan Groenewald /( )\ www.aims.ac.za ^^-^^ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
