On 15/01/16 15:29, William Stein wrote:
On Friday, January 15, 2016, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
On 2016-01-15 16:00, William Stein wrote:
Why Python moved to github:
http://www.snarky.ca/the-history-behind-the-decision-to-move-python-to-github
<
http://www.snarky.ca/the-history-behind-the-decision-to-move-python-to-github#toc_3
It seems to boil down to "we use GitHub because everybody uses GitHub". I
see the point, but I would certainly miss Trac
That was the argument for github versus gitlab. It was not the argument
for switching away from hosting their own infrastructure.
Their infrastructure was terrible. This is not the case of Sage. It is
not clear to me what would be better with github? Does anybody has a
serious proposal for a github workflow? If you do so, then open a trac
ticket with it! I only see a potential increase of the number of pull
requests. Which would actually be bad since we have a lot of pending
tickets.
Doing as "Guido says" or "as everybody does" is by far the worse
arguments I can imagine. And I agreed with something in the post: just
pay attention to people who are clearly willing to do the job.
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
