Am Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 09:39:57 UTC+1 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 18 December 2015 08:33:05 UTC, Martin R wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I propose to delete all code from sage, because it doesn't work 
>> in all circumstances.
>>
>> It might be useful for some people (not all that many), but we are 
>> actually doing them a favour because we save them from using software in 
>> circumstances where it doesn't apply.  Thus, by deleting sage, we will 
>> contribute to their happiness.
>>
>> Moreover, we are going to save a lot of disk space and cpu time, that 
>> will then find much better use!
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> PS: more seriously: if you don't know what to_permutation does, why would 
>> you use it?
>>
> WTF? Permutation on a set is a just a bijection, isn't it? 
> And whoever coded and reviewed this crap cannot even tell 0 from a 
> negative number, you know:
>
> sage: s=SetPartition([[0,1,2],[3,4]])
> sage: s.to_permutation()
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ValueError                                Traceback (most recent call 
> last) 
> ...
> ValueError: All elements should be strictly positive integers, and I just 
> found a negative one.
>  
>
> Indeed, as I said, we should get rid of the Permutation class, because it 
is buggy.

Martin 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to