Hello, -it would be a good idea to warn the user if some results may be wrong due > to the used ring. Perhaps this deserves a ticket on its own. >
+1 > -use is_positive for non exact ring > I do not understand the aim of that. -Perhaps containment should be done combinatorially in the case of an > inexact ring (looking at the incidence matrix) and using the canonical > ordering of vertices and facets? > It "may" be better in terms of speed. In terms of correctness, however, it is probably equivalent. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
