On 1 October 2015 at 17:38, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > ... > When I first encountered Sage's category framework, I expected to see > something similar to what we now have in CAP, but it has in fact a rather > different flavour and purpose. >
Understood. I am not arguing against the way this was done in Sage but I continue to wish for something both simpler and more ambitious. :) I am very interested in the use of adjunction in programming languages and the definition of types by construction of universals. Perhaps CAP is relevant? Can you provide a reference to a relevant paper? Cheers, Bill Page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
