> TLDR: Don't install OSX 10.11 if you want to use Sage
>
>
This should probably be prominently mentioned somewhere on the download 
pages...

 

> OSX 10.11 disabled DYLD_* variables for scripts, more precisely: If a 
> script file begins with a shebang the DYLD_* environment variables are 
> omitted from the set of environment variables passed to that interpreter. 
> So that fundamentally kills the way Sage runs on OSX.
>
> We either 
> a) always re-set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in each bash or Python script that 
> calls one of Sage's binaries, or
> b) give up on DYLD/LD_LIBRARY_PATH and switch to rpath/runpath. Which we 
> should have done a decade ago but then nobody is listening to me ;-P Which 
> also means: no relocatable binaries unless your system has a tool to 
> rewrite the paths installed.
>

So if someone downloads a binary it would be useless anyway, or if they 
build from scratch but then move it to Applications/ it would be useless, 
or (presumably) both?  That's not ideal at all for end users, though I 
guess the whole mess isn't ideal :(

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to