On Sunday, September 6, 2015 at 11:29:14 PM UTC+2, Simon King wrote: > > Nice, thanks for the pointer! But would that work in a binary > distribution (i.e., is "build" present in a binary distribution?)? >
Well right now it is since a "binary" is just a tarred source tree with artifacts. What would be your preference for <interface>.version()? > Output as string whatever the interfaced program uses (or most commonly uses). I don't really see a need for making it consistent between different interfaces, whatever that even means. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
