On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 10:51:09 AM UTC+2, Nils Bruin wrote: > > > so I'd think there's a leak in constructing univar_pd. My guess would be a > cached routine that shouldn't be cached. > A little bisection shows that the leak is caused by calling "eigenvalues".
However L=[c for c in gc.get_objects() if type(c) is sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_compiled.univar_pd] objgraph.show_backrefs(L[1000],filename="test.png") seems to show that the only reference that's findable by python's gc is the one from L! So the leak in this case might be due to a refcounting error (or a reference to a python object held by something outside the scope of the python memory manager). Or I've overlooked some subtle issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
