On Friday, 3 July 2015 10:36:45 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Helloooooooooooo, 
>
> > Realistically, we don't have a chance of pickling interface objects when 
> we 
> > don't have any deeper understanding of the object in the interfaced 
> system. 
> > Unless the interfaced system supports pickling natively, which few do. 
>
> Yep yep. 
>
> > So my suggestion would be to define x.dumps() as x.sage().dumps(), that 
> is, 
> > just pickle the value in Sage. Doesn't work for the singular(3) example 
> > since the conversion Singular integers->Sage integers hasn't been 
> > implemented but at least you get the error immediately and not later 
> when 
> > you try to load the object. 
>
 
At least this will work for (most) GAP objects.
 

>
> Sounds right. Better have an exception now than lost data. 
>
> Is there anybody around who would know how to change that? I don't 
> feel much at home around pickling and interfaces ^^; 
>
> Nathann 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to