> "make" sometimes involves a lot of compilation if you switch back and > forth in git branches that are based on different versions of Sage. But > after all, if you work with different Sage versions then rebuilding the > spkgs that have changed between versions is the right thing to do. >
I would think that's the problem, but in at least one case the build failed immediately in one branch, with *nothing* recompiled. When I switched to the original branch, it went about recompiling most everything. > Anyway, "make" does *not* want to rebuild all of Sage unless there is a > reason. So, I don't see a reason for changing it. > OK > NB: Since for me the docs are the most annoying aspect of "make", I > usually > do "make start". > Even that's not my problem. Thanks, though john -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
